| Information |
| Denomination |
| Country |
| Location |
| Printer |
| Huge Table |
| Short Codes |
| Nice Serials |
| Note Analysis |
| Year |
| Month |
| Top Days |
| Hits |
| Hits by Month |
| Hit Locations |
| Hit List |
| Hit Analysis |
| Trivia |
| Charts |
Interesting Serial Numbers
TOP-10 of the same consecutive serial numbers| # | Serial | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ***AAAAAA*** |  | 03.02.2007 | |
| 2 | ***AAAAA*A** |  | 24.01.2007 | |
| 3 | **AABBCACCCC |  | 10.05.2007 | |
| 4 | **AAAAA***** | | ** | 07.02.2009 |
| 5 | *ABBBAACCDD* | | 09.06.2007 | |
| 6 | *AAAB*CCBBB* |  | 23.06.2006 | |
| 7 | *AAA*BCCA*BB | | 26.04.2006 | |
| 8 | **AA*BBBCCAB | | 17.06.2006 | |
| 9 | *ABBB**CAACC | | 09.01.2007 | |
| 10 | **AABCCCABB* | | 23.02.2007 | |
1534 notes (64,3 % of all notes) had at least 2 same numbers in a row.
186 notes (7,8 % of all notes) had at least 3 same numbers in a row.
20 notes (0,8 % of all notes) had at least 4 same numbers in a row.
3 notes (0,1 % of all notes) had at least 5 same numbers in a row.
1 note (0,0 % of all notes) had at least 6 same numbers in a row.
TOP-10 of recuring serial numbers
| # | Serial | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *ABBCCABBCAC | | 28.07.2007 | |
| 2 | *AAABCDDBBBC | | 23.06.2006 | |
| 3 | *ABAC*BABBCC | | 15.10.2006 | |
| 4 | *ABCAAABCDAD | | 31.10.2006 | |
| 5 | *ABAACABDACD | | 24.01.2007 | |
| 6 | *ABCDBCDADCB | | 17.02.2007 | |
| 7 | *ABACCDCBDCC | | 21.03.2007 | |
| 8 | **AABBCACCCC | | 10.05.2007 | |
| 9 | *A*BBAAABBB* | | * | 03.05.2008 |
| 10 | *AABCACDDBBD | | * | 22.12.2008 |
1 note (0,0 % of all notes) consisted of 3 different numbers.
9 notes (0,4 % of all notes) consisted of 4 different numbers.
166 notes (7,0 % of all notes) consisted of 5 different numbers.
629 notes (26,4 % of all notes) consisted of 6 different numbers.
946 notes (39,6 % of all notes) consisted of 7 different numbers.
516 notes (21,6 % of all notes) consisted of 8 different numbers.
117 notes (4,9 % of all notes) consisted of 9 different numbers.
2 notes (0,1 % of all notes) consisted of 10 different numbers.
More silliness with numbers
498 notes (20,9 % of all notes) didn't contain number 0
579 notes (24,3 % of all notes) didn't contain number 1
647 notes (27,1 % of all notes) didn't contain number 2
717 notes (30,1 % of all notes) didn't contain number 3
754 notes (31,6 % of all notes) didn't contain number 4
808 notes (33,9 % of all notes) didn't contain number 5
820 notes (34,4 % of all notes) didn't contain number 6
846 notes (35,5 % of all notes) didn't contain number 7
821 notes (34,4 % of all notes) didn't contain number 8
904 notes (37,9 % of all notes) didn't contain number 9
*** Addition(s) within the last week
** Addition(s) within the last three months
* Addition(s) within the last year
Generated 2009-04-04 14:24:02 (by NIG version 1.657)